Marchex, MDNH, domain names, and CyberBandits

darren on November 29th, 2006

This is an old post that was private that I decided to make public:

I was doing some domain speculating this weekend & kept running across Marchex sites everywhere. Then I read an article over at dnjournal that talks about Marchex and their $164M investment into direct navigation (domains). So I figured I’d get my hands dirty and see what they really had behind all those numbers. It kind of shocked me…

Read the rest of this entry »

Subscribe to this blog's RSS feed

First off, a big congratulations to Brad & Justin! They are both great representatives for the search industry whom I’ve come to know through various conferences and parties and people over the past few years.

The big news is that LocalLaunch was acquired by RHDonnelley. 

By combining these core capabilities with RHD’s existing print and local online search offerings, including the top-performing DexOnline.com site, the company is well-positioned to generate additional leads and deliver an expanded level of service to advertisers.

Does this mean I have a new competitor in eWhisper? Sure hope not ;) Stick to the businesses Brad, there’s nothing good going on over here in people lookup land.

So here are the list of some sites of the entire relationship I’m trying to visualize:

So is there soon to be a true IYP out of this group with both platform, data, salesforce, and marketing intellect? And is Dex going to be that brand?

Dunkin Donuts & Danny Sullivan

darren on September 8th, 2006

Like most in the search industry I’m a big Danny Sullivan fan & wish him the best in wherever he goes next. But even more exciting than search news (I understand some people don’t find search news exciting) are his posts on Dunkin’ Donuts (I think everyone should find donuts exciting.)

First a little background. Read the rest of this entry »

More on the AOL contribution to KW research

darren on August 11th, 2006

More people doing fun stuff

http://www.bad-neighborhood.com/suggest.php
http://www.dontdelete.com/
http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2006-08-08-n53.html

http://fakerake.com/tag/AOL

one thing that sticks out is how people keep going back and searching for the same thing. i know people use search as navigation now, but I didn’t realize how many people did this and how frequently. one user kept searching for “bankofamerica” almost daily. Bookmarks & the address bar is your friend, use it. But it’s a good reminder of the level of sophistication you’re dealing with. You can’t expect people to learn to use their browser when they need to figure out “how to make a leprechaun trap” or beat the system and get the “free pregnancy test online to see if you are pregnant or not.” They just don’t have time…well, unless they’re now time travellers after finding out how to change time of day to pm from am

AOL OOPS

darren on August 8th, 2006

While some people at SES are talking govt conspiracy theories with this “release” of data - all signs point to incompetence. I wish I had more time in the first few days to dig around and put up a linkbait site for it, but instead I’ll just watch them as they come out.

There are going to be some insights search marketers can get from this data. Both competitive intelligence as well as searcher behaviors over a 3 month period.

http://www.askthebrain.com/aol/

http://aolsearchlogs.com/

http://plentyoffish.wordpress.com

and of course the raw data itself is mirrored and bittorrent at various places. Good times, it’s a little weird that it’s not really making any kind of news at SES though

The Prehensile Long Tail

darren on July 27th, 2006
A long time before the long tail is wagging the web

A few people have sent me that link today. I’ve been long supporter of the long tail…for SEM. The long tail in the WSJ article is really in terms of products (hits & best sellers vs. misses.) I guess you can make the correlation from SEM to what they are discussing in the article, but I wouldn’t take that leap. Here’s whyI will not poo poo the long tail:

1. It’s big.
Maybe it’s not 98% (did he really claim this?), but it’s at least 20% as with the old 80/20 rule. And even at that level why dismiss such a big chunk?
2. It’s easy.
At that long end of the tail, you have less competition. Think in terms of SEO: “shoes” vs. “buy men’s nike air max online.” The latter is an example of the long tail and much much easier to rank for than “shoes”
3. It’s better.
Would you rather have a visitor that says “i’m just browsing for shoes” or “i’m looking to buy nike air max’s in size 10 from this store”. duh. conversions are going to be exponentially higher for the more detailed phrase. Those people are much further along in the buying process. Dan Boberg had a great slide back at Orlando pubcon that I wish I could find online. I hear Yahoo has an ebook that has all that data, but I’m yet to find it.